Skip to main content

Full text of "BUFORA Journal Volume 02 No 01 Summer1967"

See other formats


VOI. 2 No. I SUMMER 1967 



JOURNAL 


BRITISH U.F.O. RESEARCH ASSOCIATION 





The BRITISH UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT 
RESEARCH ASSOCIATION 

Founded 1964 

(Incorporating the London U.F.O. Research Organisation, founded 1959, 
and the British U.F.O. Association, founded 1962). 


THE BUFORA JOURNAL AND BULLETIN 

Volume 2 Number 1 Summer 1967 


CONTENTS 

(including presentation sheet of UFO photographs) 


Editorial ... ... ... ... • 2 

Signals from Space ... ... ... ... ... 3 

Personal Column ... ... ... ... ... 4 

BUFORA Chairman’s letter to Dr. E. U. Condon ... 5 

Leys, Orthotenies & the UFOs ... ... ... 6 

Letters to the Editor ... ... ... ... 8 

BUFORA A.G.M., 1967 . 10 

Book Reviews ... ... ... ... ... II 

Notes & Quotes ... ... ... ... ... 12 

UFO Activity in Brazil - 1965 ... ... ... 14 

Association Jottings ... ... ... ... 15 

UFO Miscellany ... ... ... ... ... 16 

BUFORA Late News . 18 

Regional Information Officers ... ... ... 19 


LECTURES : The Association sponsors monthly meetings in London. Details of meetings 

arranged by member societies or branches, should be obtained by writing direct to them. 






I 


AIMS: 

1. To encourage and promote unbiased scientific investigation and research into Unidentified 
Flying Object phenomena. 

2. To collect and disseminate evidence and data relating to Unidentified Flying Objects. 

3. To co-ordinate UFO Research on a nation-wide scale and co-operate with persons and 
organisations engaged upon similar research in all parts of the world. 

MEMBER SOCIETIES : Anglo-Polish UFO Research Club ; British Flying Saucer Bureau ; 
Cambridge University Group for the Investigation of UFOs ; Cheltenham Branch of 
BUFORA ; Croydon UFO Research and Investigation Society ; Direct Investigation Group 
on Aerial Phenomena ; Fleet Street UFOs Study Group ; Halifax Branch of BUFORA ; 
Imperial College (London) UFO Group ; Isle of Wight UFO Investigation Society ; Leeds 
University UFO Group ; Merseyside UFO Research Group ; Northern Ireland Branch of 
BUFORA ; North London UFO Investigation Bureau ; Scottish UFO Research Society ; 
South Lincolnshire UFO Study Group ; Stratford-on-Avon UFO Group ; Tyneside UFO 
Society. 

OFFICERS, (honorary) 

President : G. W. CREIGHTON, M.A., F.R.G.S., F.B l.S. 

Vice-President : L. G. CRAMP, A.R.Ae.S., M.S.LA. 

B.U.F.O.R.A. Executive Committee : 

Chairman : G. G. DOEL, M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P., D.M.R.E. 

Vice-Chairman and Publicity Officer : L. E. BEER 
Honorary Secretary : M. C. HOLT, B.A. 

Honorairy* Treasurer : S. L. SMITH, B.A. 

Journal Editor and Evaluation Consultant : J. CLEARY-BAKER, Ph.D. 

Central Research Co-ordinator : G. N. P. STEPHENSON 

Librarian and Information Officer : K. ROGERS 

Chairman of Contacts Section : Miss E. BUCKLE 

Projects Officer : E. HATVANY 

Photographic Consultant : L. MOORE 

Assistant Secretaries : Mrs. A. LLOYD, P. WAIN 

Co-opted executives : I. MACKAY, A. WEST, N. OLIVER. 

MEMBERSHIP: The annual subscription for individual members is one guinea ; $3 U.S.A. 

and Canada. Membership is open to all persons supporting the aims of the Association and 
whose application is approved by the Executive Committee. Application/Information forms 
are obtainable from the Hon. Secretary, Vice-Chairman or other Executive members. 

JOURNAL : Published Quarterly. Available only to individual members and member societies 
or by exchange. EXCHANGE PUBLICATIONS should be sent direct to the Journal Editor. 

ADVERTISEMENTS : Readers classified advertisements : 3d. a word. For details of whole, 
half and quarter page rates, please write to the Publicity Officer : Mr. L. E. Beer, Flat 15, Fresh¬ 
water Court, Crawford Street, London, W.l. 

CORRESPONDENCE : General correspondence and subscriptions should be sent to the Hon. 
Secretary ; M. C. Holt, B.A., Claremont Road, Claygate, Esher, Surrey. UFO reports should 
be sent (or ’phoned) to the regional or central information officer^ as indicated elsewhere in this 
journal. 


Please send editorial material direct to the Editor 
3 Devenish Road, Weeke, Winchester, Hants. 




2 


EDITORIAL 

If, as many of us have been led by prolonged observation and study to 
conclude, UFOs are extra-terrestrial spacecraft piloted or controlled by alien 
intelligences, the class of narratives referred to in the jargon of UFO-research as 
‘contact’ and ‘operator’ reports assumes major importance. It would seem to be 
a fair assumption that, if there are visitors from remote worlds ‘up there,’ they 
must sometimes come down to earth and land. 

Unfortunately, this particular field of investigation offers ample scope for both 
fraud and self-deception and one is bound to admit that cranks and lunatics on the 
one hand and devotees of the ‘easy buck’ on the other, have not failed to take 
advantage of the opportunities. Faced with an indigestible mess of often mutually 
irreconcilable stories, ranging all the way from the credible through the dubious to 
the ludicrous, some societies of UFO-researchers, like Major Keyhoe’s NICAP, have 
cut the Gordian Knot by refusing to investigate ‘contact’ tales at all. One may 
sympathise with the attitude-of-mind thus expressed but the feeling within BUFORA 
would seem to be — happily in my view — that condemnation of an entire class 
of narratives without investigation may result in a state of affairs in which the baby 
is thrown out along with the bath-water ! 

There are, of course, ‘contact' reports which are so wild and improbable as 
hardly to merit the labour of an enquiry into them. Open-mindedness is not the 
same thing as credulity and the serious UFO-researcher has no business chasing 
around the country-side checking on fairy tales ! Beyond this, a given narrative 
must be assessed on its merits. My own conclusion, as of now, is that no existing 
‘contactee account is deserving of full credence. Most are transparent fictions but 
a few may contain a small nucleus of fact obscured by layers of invention, 
imagination and pseudo-religious speculation. 

So-called ‘operator’ reports, where a person sees a UFO on the ground with 
alien denizens in the immediate vicinity and does NOT proceed to weave his or 
her experience into the stuff of a cult, are deserving of serious attention. When 
many such reports are examined and all or most of them are found to embody 
common features, it becomes possible cautiously to frame a number of hypotheses. 

Firstly, almost all ‘operator’ stories represent the UFO-denizens as humanoid in 
physical type. The ‘bug-eyed monsters' beloved of science-fiction writers are con¬ 
spicuous by their absence from the class of reports under review. 

(a) Humanoids of normal proportions and appearance, 

(b) ‘Little Men’ of varying stature and type. 

There are a handful of reports of very large entities but these unquestionably relate 
to mechanical robots and not to living creatures. This was suggested by the skid¬ 
marks at the scene of the Flatwoods landing of 1952 in West Virginia. It was 
confirmed by the Cisco Grove, (California), case of 1964. 

The ‘Little Men’ have featured in a flood of fictitious tales, stemming from 
the one told, apparently in good faith, by Frank Scully in 1950. (Scully’s mis- 
leaders, the ‘con-men’ Newton and ‘Gee,’ apparently derived their inspiration from 
the Fitzgerald and Garney report of August 1949). Some are hairy and vicious, 




3 


as in various Venezuelan and French reports of 1954 -’55. Others are possessed 
of abnormally large craniums, as were the visitants of Valensole. Others again are 
diminutive replicas of normal humanoids. Over-development of specific organs, 
not infrequently encountered, suggests specialisation, as does the stereotyped 
behaviour-pattern associated with most ‘Little Men’ reports. It appears to me that 
the ‘Little Men’ are, in all likelihood, ‘biological robots,’ i.e. living automata bred 
and conditioned to perform specific tasks such as the collection of geological and 
biological specimens from planetary surfaces. 

This — excluding from consideration certain highly speculative possibilities 
mooted by Michel and others — leaves us with the humanoids of normal proportions 
and appearance as the true ‘operators’ and UFO-denizens behind the phenomena in 
our skies. These too, insofar as our reports can be relied upon, are a ‘mixed bag,’ 
albeit the reported variations in stature, colour of hair, shape of face, etc., are not 
greater than those which confront us in the range of human types on earth. There 
is, after all, little enough in common between a pygmy and one of those giant 
Patagonian natives now extinct but frequently seen by navigators of earlier centuries 
in the latitude of Cape Horn. 

Logical deduction suggests that a number of space-travelling races may be 
engaged in the current surveillance of our planet. Could it be, perhaps, that these 
races, or most of them, form two great confederations of UFO-denizens and that 
these confederations stand behind the two major Power Blocs presently existing on 
Earth unbeknown, of course, to the protagonists of the rival political ideologies 
involved ? 

This is not, as has been suggested, to seek to play ‘Cowboys and Indians’ on 
a Galactic scale. It is simply to suggest that a race may break out of the grip of 
its natal planet as a fully-developed unit, spiritually as well as mentally mature, or 
may effect the break-out while in a condition of mental activity and spiritual 
atrophy - in other words, sunk in materialism. Readers can work out the impli¬ 
cations of these ideas for themselves. 

Small countries sometimes manage to preserve their neutrality in wartime 
because it is in the interests of both combatants to avoid involving them. May not 
the failure of the UFO-denizens to make direct contact with humanity, stem from 
the fact that it is advantageous, at present, to permit the Earth to retain the status 
of a Galactic Neutral’ in a battle of Cosmic proportions ? 

SIGNALS FROM SPACE 

On the evening of April 12 1965, two Soviet radio-astronomers, Gennedy 
Sholomitsky and Dr. Nikolai Lardashev, claimed that they had received signals from 
a super-civilization far out on the edge of the observable universe. For over a year 
the two astronomers had analysed signals from one of the new quasi-stellar object 
radio sources known as CTA-102, and discovered that the emissions followed a 
regular pattern of ‘flickerings’ repeated once every 100 days. This claim was met 
with considerable scepticism from the majority of Western scientists and within a 
few days nothing more was heard of the matter. 

However, it appears that Soviet radio-astronomers have not been idle during the 
past two years. Last summer, proposals were forwarded to the secretary-general of 
the International Astronomical Union bv Soviet scientists detailing a possible inter¬ 
national research programme to look for signals from extra-terrestrial civilizations. (1) 




4 


The plan was to concentrate on a search for signals in a narrow frequency band, 
in the range of centimetre waves most suitable for interstellar communications. The 
Russian astronomers suggested wavelengths of 10-5, 5-2 and 2 - 6 cm. (Note that 
these are all dividends ot 21 cm. — the emission wavelength of interstellar hydrogen, 
and the one most likely to be studied by alien radio-astronomers). The search was 
to have been restricted to a radius of 1000 light-years from Earth — a volume in 
which there are at least ten million stars. The scientists believed that it would take 
only five years to complete the survey if all the radio-telescopes of sufficient power 
in the world were used, but over 30 years if only one receiver was employed. 

This however was only the first part of the programme. The second part 
involved cataloguing all sources of radiation, in the millimetre and centimetre wave¬ 
lengths in the Universe, and searching for possible call-signals amongst ail this 
radiation. This work would have been carried out day and night with the aid of 
large radio-telescopes and computers, and could have been completed in about five 
years. It would have run in conjunction with the first part of the plan. 

These proposals, although rejected, were all very reminiscent of the American 
Project Ozma of 1960, but were much more advanced in scope. 

With all the UFO activity in the world, both now and during the past few 
years, it is interesting to note that Soviet scientists of high repute are turning their 
attention to the problems of extra-terrestrial communication. 

It was reported some months ago that two leading Russian radio-astronomers 
had been elected to the Order of the Dolphin. (2) The Order is a band of twenty 
scientists who, despite opposition from their colleagues, firmly believe in the exist¬ 
ence of extra-terrestrial civilizations and study the problems of communicating with 
them. Unfortunately, both scientists have refused to disclose their names to the 
Press, but one is reported to have said, “Even a few years ago, it would have been 
fatal to one’s scientific reputation to take up problems of extra-terrestrial civilizations. 

The members of the Order, from its very foundation, realised that some of our 

colleagues were prepared to laugh at us. But we are optimistic. Trying to apply 
exact methods, we shall advance by small steps, without any ballyhoo.” 

These activities, together with others in the past, (3) seem to indicate that the 
Soviet Union is deeply interested in the possible existence of extra-terrestrial civil¬ 
izations. Perhaps, the announcement of signals from CTA - 102 was only a test to 
see what the world’s reaction would be to such news. We cannot tell, but some 

day the truth will be known — and that day is not so very far in the future. 

R. A. Jahn. 

Notes. 

(1) Extra-terrestrial Communication, Spaceflight, July 1966. 

(2) Order of the Dolphin, ibid. 

(3) Flying Saucer Review, May - June 1965. 

PERSONAL COLUMN 

Help publicise BUFORA with BUFORA envelope stickers : 250 - 7/6d ; 

100 - 3/6d ; 50 - 2/6d ; (assorted) post free ; or S.A.E. for free samples 

from : Lionel Beer, Flat 15, Freshwater Court, Crawford Street, London, W. 1. 

Dell’s FLYING SAUCERS magazine No. 2 now available (No. 1. sold out) 
60 photos/illustrations inc. 20 of UFOs : from Lionel Beer. 

Wanted : Volume 1 and various back nos. of FLYING SAUCER REVIEW, 
and its predecessor FLYING SAUCER NEWS. Second-hand books also wanted. 
Write to: Lionel Beer, Flat 15, Freshwater Court, Crawford Street, London, W.l. 



5 


BUFORA’S CHAIRMAN WRITES TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE 
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO UFO INVESTIGATION PANEL, 

Dr. E. U. CONDON. 

Colorado/UFO. Dr. G. G. Doel. Chairman, B.U.F.O.R.A. 

26 Heath Drive, Potters Bar, 

Hertfordshire, England. 

Dear Sir, 

It is with great interest that we of the British Unidentified Flying Object 
Research Association learn of the untiring efforts which are being made in your 
country to discover the true facts underlying the frequently reported appearances of 
unidentified flying objects in the skies of the World. 

As Chairman of this Association I have been requested to offer our services in 
any way you may deem helpful to your investigations which we understand are 
designed to unravel the tangled mass of evidence pointing to the existence of these 
objects which is now available from all over the world. 

We in the British Isles have not yet succeeded in obtaining open co-operation 
from Governmental Authorities in our researches in spite of the fact we have an 
immense amount of evidence to place before them. Many of our active members 
are scientists and we are gradually recruiting more and more persons of high 
scientific and philosophical standing who are prepared to weigh this evidence with 
unbiassed minds. We are evidently far from obtaining official and financial backing 
which is needed before we are able to mount a full scale inquiry under a recognised 
scientific body although we have active UFO study groups all over the Country and 
at Oxford and Cambridge Universities. 

We are most impressed and relieved that in America there has been sufficient 
Governmental interest to set up your Investigating Commission under the University 
of Colorado into the nature of these Unidentified Flying Objects and offer you freely 
the services of our Research Association. We are also in touch with other European 
UFO study Groups and Societies and with Australia which has a remarkable number 
of ‘sightings’ to its credit. 

Our Research and Investigation departments have collected evidence for several 
years which is at your disposal. We trust that we shall be priviledged to help your 
investigations in any way we can. 

Enclosed please find some of our Lecture Programmes and a short account of 
the origins and aims of the Association so that you may be satisfied that B.U.F.O.R.A. 
is^ an earnest Scientific body .... not a bunch of cranks or cultists. The British 
Unidentified Flying Object Research Association sends congratulations to you on 
being the first properly instituted Governmental Commission set up to study UFOs, 
and wish you every success in your researches. 

We hope that you will allow us to join you in this unique Project the results 
of which may well be of unprecedented importance to the whole world. 

On behalf of B.U.F.O.R.A. I remain, yours faithfully 

Geoffrey Doel. M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P., D.M.R.E. 




6 


LEYS, ORTHOTENIES & THE UFOs 

It would be idle to deny that Alfred Watkins, author of, “The Old Straight 
Track,” was a distinguished pioneer in the field of Photography. Unfortunately, to 
judge from his spare-time activities, he was considerably less knowledgeable in the 
field of Prehistoric Archaeology. An expert in one field of scientific research may 
be the veriest tyro in another. This is a fact seldom realised by the non-expert. 

If we are to believe in the extensive network of straight prehistoric trackways 
visualised by Watkins as existing in this Country, two things have first to be 
demonstrated. Firstly, it must be shown that the pre-Roman inhabitants of Britain 
were capable of planning and executing a complicated trackway-system of this kind. 
Secondly, assuming that they possessed the requisite technical competence to under¬ 
take the work, it must be shown that they had a sound motive for undertaking it. 

As to the first point, the descriptions of Britain found in such classical 
historians as Tacitus and Caesar paint a picture of a rude, semi-barbaric Cukure, 
akin to, if less advanced than, that of Gaul in the early days of the Roman occu¬ 
pation. Britain in 70 B.C. was a land of forests, swamps and barren downlands, 
inhabited by warring tribes who derived such refinements of culture as they possessed 
from their intercourse with the Gauls, who, in their turn, were subject to the 
civilizing influence of Rome. 

Enthusiasts will no doubt claim that the Romans deprecated the British Culture 
in order to boost their own. The short answer is that plenty of people in Rome 
had been to Britain, or knew others who had. A major falsification of the facts 
would not have gone unremarked or uncorrected. 

If it is suggested that the Watkins network of trackways was the work of a 
vanished Culture which flourished at an earlier epoch, why did not the Roman 
writers remark on the many remains of such a Culture which must, ex hypothesi.. 
have still existed in their time and ought not to be wholly absent in ours ? The 
majestic but crudely-hewn monoliths of Stonehenge are the only major relics of a 
pre-Roman Culture in Britain really deserving of note. They are by no means 
unimposing, certainly, but against the towering grandeur of the Temple of Amon-Ra 
at Thebes, or the mighty Sun Temple at Baalbek, they appear as the erections of a 
comparatively primitive People. 

On the second point, prehistoric men did not construct roads or trackways in 
order to perpetuate memories of lost Atlantis, or to mark the passage of UFOs, or 
for any of the romantic reasons often adduced by well-meaning persons who seek, 
in the mythical labyrinths of an idealised Past, escape from the ugly realities of a 
harsh Present and relief from the terrors of an uncertain Future. Their object was 
much more utilitarian, in short, to get themselves and their livestock from A to B, 
as quickly and safely as possible. 

A prehistoric man who attempted to drive his animals from A to B in a 
straight line would almost certainly get into serious difficulties. He would lose 
some of his stock in bogs or thickets. Others would drown in attempting to pass 
a river. As a matter of fact, known prehistoric trackways wind all over the place. 
They skirt bogs, meander round steep hills, follow a river bank to the nearest ford. 
On long journeys, prehistoric men followed the ridgeways, the crests of hill-systems. 
This provided a measure of security, in that visibility at any given stage of the 



7 


journey was better than on low ground and wild animals or robbers had perforce 
to launch an attack uphill. In wet weather, too, natural drainage prevented the 
passage of men and animals from converting the track into a quagmire. 

I am, of course, aware of the superficially convincing plans which Ley-Hunters 
draw to demonstrate the reality of their alleged system of straight tracks. They 
forget that these Islands supported a comparatively dense population from, say, 
5,000 B.C. A long line of generations left their mark on the land, in the shape 
of burial mounds and barrows, earthworks, monoliths and the like. When all sorts 
of Roman, Mediaeval and even later structures are pressed into service, on the 
partially accurate hypothesis that our ancestors tended to build on the derelict sites 
of their predecessors’ works, the whole business becomes one huge reductio ad 
absurdum. It would be all but impossible to extend a line for any distance, in any 
direction, on a map of Britain, without its cutting several early sites of one kind or 
another. 

The process is somewhat analogous to that which resulted in early astronomers 
dividing the stars into constellations. Lines were drawn between bright stars which 
were, of course, wholly unconnected with each other in any real sense, so that 
shapes of men, objects and animals were formed arbitrarily. The human mind has 
a tendency to link unconnected things in imaginary patterns — probably a sub¬ 
conscious mechanism arising out of the basic insecurity which niggles most human 
beings when confronted with the vast and apparently chaotic variety of natural 
phenomena. 

UFOs rnay or may not manifest a more than casual interest in prehistoric sites. 
It is interesting, if no more, that the ‘Great Ridgeway’ from the West runs by the 
site of the Charlton ‘crater’ of 1963, northward to Heytesbury and beyond, then 
bends sharply eastward between Battlesbury and Cradle Hill near Warminster. It 
runs across the Plain to Imber, then turns northward again into the Vale of Pewsey. 
Coincidence ? Maybe ! I don’t know ! 

One thing is certain, any interest the UFOs may display in prehistoric sites has 
nothing to do with Watkins’ chimerical system of tracks and ‘leys.’ In attempting 
to tie-in UFO-research with a gross archaeological fallacy of this sort, certain students, 
no matter how well-meaning and sincere they may be and undoubtedly are, must 
be regarded as hampering the real work of UFO investigation. 

Incidentally, in order to establish that a UFO is actually in the immediate 
vicinity of a prehistoric site, it should, when seen, either be very low in altitude or 
directly above the site as observed from the site itself. An object at a height of a 
few thousand feet above the ground may be visible for many miles in open 
country. It will not do to postulate a connection between a site and a UFO simply 
because both are in the field of vision at one time. 

As regards the alleged connection between Michel’s ‘Orthoteny’ and the Watkins 
straight tracks, it should be observed that Michel has himself abandoned his Theory 
of Orthoteny. (I understand it has not stood up very well against mathematical 
analysis, either). Surely, to link UFOs with a discredited archaeological fallacy and 
an hypothesis which its author has himself abandoned, is to waste the time and 
labour of all concerned ? 


J. C-B. 




8 


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 

Trinity College, 

Oxford. 

12th May, 1967. 

To: Editor, ‘BUFORA JOURNAL.’ 

Dear Dr. Cleary-Baker, 

The U.F.O. Handbook No. 2, by F. M. Bull, contains a 
useful list of I.F.O.’s (Identifiable Flying Objects), but it omits one important type. 
This type was drawn to my attention by Professor M. J. Lighthill, who used to 
head the Royal Aircraft Establishment. He tells me that the propellers of helicopters 
sometimes reflect light and give the impression of being flying discs. He believes 
that many apparent UFOs are helicopters. A report on this phenomenon is essential 
for U.F.O. research and its omission from the handbook suggests that it has usually 
been overlooked. 

Chapter 9 of Coral Lorenzen’s book, ‘Flying Saucers,’ (New English Library, 
1966), discusses an exploding UFO that provided samples of pure magnesium. I 
would be grateful for information concerning the constitution of bolides. 

I have no objection to your publication of this letter in ‘BUFORA JOURNAL,’ 
preferably followed by a reply. 

Yours sincerely, 

1. J. Good. 

Dr. Good has pinpointed an omission in Handbook No. 2 which it certainly 
would be well to make good. Helicopters are to be seen in ever-increasing numbers 
nowadays and ought not to be overlooked by evaluators. I would doubt, however, 
that a very large proportion of UFO reports could be thus written off. I have 
myself evaluated a few reports as due to such aircraft. 

A bolide is simply an exploding meteor and if fragments of one reach the 
ground they assume the status of meteorites. There are two principal types of 
meteorite. One, the metallic, is composed of about 90% iron, 9% nickel and small 
quantities of other elements such as cobalt, carbon, phosphorous and sulphur. The 
other, the stony, is composed of about 36% oxygen, 25% iron, 18% silica, 14% 
magnesium and additional small amounts of nickel, cobalt, calcium, sodium, 
potassium, chromium, etc. A few meteorites seem to be a combination of the 
stony and metallic types. 

Analysis of the material from the Ubatuba UI^O seems to rule out any poss¬ 
ibility that this was a meteorite. 

J. C-B. 

Harvard College Observatory, 

Cambridge 38, Massachusetts. 
Mav 4, *1967. 

To : Editor, ‘BUFORA JOURNAL.’ 

Dear Sir, 

I have been looking through a recent issue of the ‘BUFORA JOURNAL,’ 
(Vol. 1, No. 11, Winter 1966/7), and on page 13 I find a reference to the origin 
of the word, ‘humanoid.’ 

I am sorry to rob you of your pleasure in thinking you may have invented the 
word but, alas, it has been in common use among science fiction writers for many 
years — certainly more than twenty. It is also included in a dictionary published 
here in 1961 ; I haven’t checked earlier editions. 

Sincerely yours, 

(Mrs.) Lyle G. Boyd. 



9 


cc : D. H. Menzel. 

Another correspondent has drawn my attention to the fact that H. T. Wilkins 
made use of the term in one of his books. It is a very useful one and might well 
be incorporated in the text of some of the larger dictionaries. Lexicographers please 
note . 

J. C-B. 

4297, Gordon Head Road, 
Victoria, B.C., 

Canada. 

March 30, 1967. 

To : Editor, ‘BUFORA JOURNAL.’ 

Dear Dr. Cleary-Baker, 

I should greatly value an article outlining exactly why you 
wrote those last four lines at the bottom of page 9, in Vol. 1, No. 11 of the 
Winter 1966/7 issue of ‘BUFORA JOURNAL.’ 

Why is the 3-dimensional idea of UFOs losing ground ? I feel impelled to 
say that I think it complicates the issue needlessly, to bring in considerations which 
involve other dimensions. Ought we not rather to try to solve all we can on the 
basis of ‘known’ dimensions, assuming simply that ‘they’ have succeeded in reaching 
us before we have managed to reach their planet ? 

Your reply could perhaps be printed in the ‘Journal.’ 

Yours sincerely, 

P. M. H. Edwards, Ph.D. 

I know of no good reasons for assuming that extra-terrestrial life would differ 
in any essential particulars from life as we know it. On this view, the physical 
conditions of the other planets of our solar system will have precluded the evolution 
of intelligent life-forms upon any of them. There might exist colonies of aliens on 
Mars or elsewhere in the system, but the colonies would, ex hypothesi, be obliged 
to dwell under domes, within which air and temperature could be controlled and 
regulated. 

Such colonies, if they exist, (as they very well may), cannot be supposed to be 
the bases for the bewildering variety of alien craft reported in our skies since the 
latter years of World War Two. A handful or two of colonists, existing under 
conditions in which numbers of population would need to be controlled strictly, for 
obvious reasons, would not need and could not operate such numbers of machines. 
We are, therefore, forced back upon the idea that the bulk of the UFOs originate 
upon planets circling other and distant stars. 

Travel through the Universe on ‘three-dimensional lines,’ (when the ultimate 
speed attainable would, of necessity, fail short of the velocity of light), would be 
too unimaginably protracted a business to comport with the ubiquity of the UFOs 
within our terrestrial environs. 

It would seem that transit from system to system through hyper-space, (through 
a ‘fifth dimension’ if you prefer the term), is the most plausible way of accounting 
for the fact that the UFOs are with us in large numbers. Since time and space 
arc bound up intimately together, as Einstein has. demonstrated, it may not be too 
fanciful to speculate that time may be transcended as well as space, to some extent, 
in the course of hyperspatial travel. 

All this is not to deny that UFOs are three-dimensional machines from three- 
dimensional worlds. I have no inclination, at present, to come to terms with the 
late Dr. Meade Layne’s ’etherians,’ albeit his conceptions of ‘mat’ and ‘demat,’ like 
Charles Fort’s notion of ‘teleportation,’ may have much to commend them. 







10 


Science fiction ? I am not very greatly troubled by the charge, which was 
hurled at me many times in past years because I dared to suggest that UFOs might 
be alien artifacts — an idea which is now ‘catching on’ among the more forward- 
looking members of the scientific community and may one day percolate down to 
the mental level of those who fear original thought and wait always for others to 
blaze the trail for them. 

J. C-B. 


DISPLAY 

ADVERTISING 


HELP BUFORA IN A PRACTICAL WAY 
BY ADVERTISING YOUR BUSINESS 
IN THIS JOURNAL. 


Moderate Rates 

Full details sent without obligation. 

Lionel Beer — Publicity Officer, 

Flat 15, Freshwater Court, 

Crawford Street, London, W.l. 


ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING, 1967 

In accordance with the provisions of Article 8 (d) of the Constitution of 
B.U.F.O.R.A., preliminary notification is given herewith that the Annual General 
Meeting of the Association will be held on Saturday, October 7th., 1967, at 6 p.m., 
in the Kensington Central Library. 

Nominations for the Offices of President and Vice-President, also Chairman, 
Vice-Chairman, Honorary Secretary and Honorary Treasurer, and for the eight 
remaining seats on the National Executive Committee, should reach the Honorary 
Secretary, in writing, not later than Saturday, August 26th., 1967. Resolutions to 
be debated at the A.G.M., should also reach the Honorary Secretary by that date, 
for inclusion on the Agenda of the Meeting. 

In the event that no rival nominations are received in respect of any of the 
above listed offices and seats, the members at present occupying same shall be 
deemed to be re-elected unopposed. An uncontested seat or office falling vacant 
before the A.G.M., will be filled by nomination and voting at the Meeting. 

Only members of the Association in good standing, i.e. in possession of a valid 
membership-card, are entitled to vote at the A.G.M. 









11 


BOOK REVIEWS 

“The Scoriton Mystery” by Eileen Buckle Published by Neville Spearman Ltd., 
^ ^ 112, Whitfield St., 

London, W.l. 

Price 30/' 

Most readers will be familiar with the strange ‘contact’ tale related by Arthur 
Bryant of the Devon hamlet of Scoriton, which, taken at face value, suggests that 
he encountered a UFO visitant who was none other than George Adamski re¬ 
incarnated. This book is the record of an enquiry into the affair, undertaken 
privately by two BUFORA members, Eileen Buckle and Norman Oliver, after the 
National Executive Committee had declined to sponsor a formal Association invest¬ 
igation on grounds of the tale’s incredibility. 

Some of the incidents described are amusing, like the episode of the ‘atomic 
physicist’ who proved to be a pathological liar. Others, concerned as they are with 
mysterious messages superimposed upon tape-recordings and journeys undertaken as 
a result of a variety of psychic, or alleged psychic, motivations, hardly lend them¬ 
selves to review in that a non-participant is in no position to assess the credibility 
of a given case. 

The book is well-produced and Eileen is a lively and capable narrator whose 
disarming frankness and humility will endear her to readers. For the rest, as she 
observes : ‘The fascination of a mystery is the challenge it presents .......’ 

J. C-B. 


“The Warminster Mystery” by Arthur Shuttlewood 

Published by Neville Spearman Ltd., 
112, Whitfield St., 
London, W.l. 

Price 25/- 

Arthur Shuttlewood is the features editor of the ‘Warminster Journal’ and has 
become widely known, in this Country and beyond, as the leading on-the-spot 
investigator of the UFO phenomena which have been reported in large numbers 
from this delightful little Wiltshire town, from the end of 1964 to date. Night 
after night, regardless of the discomforts imposed by the weather, he and his little 
team of assistants, comprising ex-R.A.F. bomber crewman ‘Bob Strong and house¬ 
wife Sybil Champion, have kept watch from Cradle Hill, near Warminster, for the 
apparitions of the ‘Thing.’ This book attests that the prolonged vigil has not been 
in vain. UFO-research owes a debt of gratitude to these devoted watchers. 

Arthur is not a scientist and prior to the middle of 1965 knew little or nothing 
about UFOs. It is a tribute to his sound commonsense that, while listening 
patiently and courteously to the theories of the horde of researchers, cranks, cultists 
and outright lunatics who have flocked to Warminster following the publicity 
accorded in the press to the ‘Thing,’ he has woven into the fabric of his personal 
acceptances only such ideas as have impressed him as rational and illuminating. He 
does not deride the well-meaning folks who have ascribed the Warminster UFOs to 
a variety of more-or-less improbable causes, ranging from the Holy Grail and the 
Ten Lost Tribes to the Russians, by way of marsh-gas and the aurora borealis. He 
has been content to catalogue such aberrations and occasionally to dismiss them with 
the gentlest touch of irony. 




THE BIRCH PHOTOGRAPH. (Fig. 1.) 


This remarkable photograph was taken by Alex. Birch aged 14 in June 1962 
in full daylight. They were observed for only a few seconds but Alex, was 
photographing his friends in a field and so had his camera ready. The other boys 
also testified to the truth of the sighting and the negative has been found to be 
quite untouched. These ‘dark UFOs’ emitted bright bubbles which floated away 
and quickly faded. 

The sighting took place near Sheffield, Yorkshire. 


THE PRATT PHOTOGRAPH. (Fig. 2.) 

The three dark objects shown were photographed by Stephen Pratt aged 15 
at about 8.30 p.m. March 28th 1966. 

They present a similar appearance to those in fig. 1. 

A bright light was seen by Stephen and his mother moving slowly across the 
sky. His father and brother joined them and Stephen took one photo. The three 
‘dark UFOs' were not seen at the time. Analysis of the negative reveals no 
touching up. The sighting took place at Conisbourough, \orkshire which is an 
interesting cofincidence. 

After careful investigation the evidence given by the witnesses in both of these 
cases is accepted as true. 





fig. I. 



fig. 2. 







[ 


fig. 3- 


fig. 4. 







UFO OVER PARIS 1963. (Fig. 3.) 

This object shown to the left of the Arc de Triomphe was originally taken in 
colour and appeared a translucent pearly grey on the colour print. It was not seen 
by the photographer and might not have been considered important until a strange 
chain of events occurred. Messrs. Kodak omitted to return the negative in question 
with others stating that there was 'a fault on the negative'. However after some 
weeks had passed both the negative and colour print were returned from the R.A.F. 
Research Centre at Boscombe Down, Wilts., without comment. Owing to the lapse 
in time it has not been possible to get further information of value concerning this 
episode. 

Analysis of the negative shows that the object is not any fault in the emulsion. 
It resembles closely the ‘Saturn' type of UFO and the attention the negative has 
received seems rather signibcant. 


UFO OVER TRINIDADE ISLAND. (Fig. 4.) 

Another Saturn type UFO taken by the olEcial photographer on board the 
‘Geophysical Year' ship Almiral Saldanha operating for the Brazilian Govt, in 
1958. The object which was witnessed by many persons on board Hew in a Hgure 
of eight course over the island and then out to sea. Several photos were taken. It 
also appeared as translucent pearly grey. The occurrence was entered in the official 
log and has been accepted as a most authentic UFO sighting. 



12 


It will be alleged by some that Arthur has written up many of the UFO 
sightings he describes in sensational vein. The short answers are two in number. 
Firstly, he is a journalist writing for the general public, not a scientist composing a 
dry-as-dust memoir for experts. Secondly, many of the incidents related are 

sensational. If one has been beaten down by savage sound vibrations, or ‘buzzed’ 

by a flaming sphere while driving along a country road, any description one may 
subsequently volunteer of the incidents is unlikely to be cold and clinical. 

It is hard to know what to make of a series of mysterious ’phone calls which 
the author received in the latter part of 1965, purporting to be communications 
from three extra-terrestrials and imparting a w'ealth of information on the alleged 
aims of the UFO-denizens and their attitude towards earthly societies. The obvious 

explanation is hoax. Arthur is mindful of this obviousness but perhaps not 

inclined to seize upon it too readily as the easy way out of an enigmatic aspect of 
his ^searches. There is, indeed, something about these conversations which strikes 
a different note from the usual moralistic claptrap of the professional cultists. There 
one must leave the matter for the present. 

The book is illustrated with a \’ariety of photographs, some of them of UFOs. 
Readers are advised to study these carefully, preferably with the aid of a magnifying- 
glass, when a wealth of detail may emerge. ' & ; & 

journalistic training has come into play in his relation of the numerous 
UFO sightings in the Warminster area, in that he has, in almost every case, been 
at pains to include the exact time, date and place of the event. This is a custom 
which I wish UFO-researchers as a whole would adopt. How often is a valuable 
report marred by the failure to include the full data upon it r 

This book ends with the happenings of April 1966 and we are promised a 
sequel carrying the story on through that year and into 1967. It will be awaited 
with interest. 

Members of BUFORA are advised to purchase this volume and study it. The 
visitations of the Warminster ‘Thing’ represent much more than an ordinary UFO 
Hap. We may account ourselves fortunate that the right man was in the right 
place at the right time, to record the onset and development of an hitherto un¬ 
parallelled wave of extra-terrestrial activity. 

I- C-B. 

RECEIVED — ‘Sky Scouts Handbook,’ published at 2/6d. by the International 
Sky Scouts Association (U.K.). Introduction bv the Hon. Brinslev Le Poer Trench 
Recommended. 

NOTES & QUOTES 
The Warminster Sound — Year 1860. 

On Tuesday the 17th Januyy, the sky being perfectly clear and not a cloud 
to be seen, loud rumblings resembling a heavy discharge of artillery, prolonged for 
above a minute, startled many persons from the strangeness of the sound and caused 
all who heard them to look upwards involuntarily. These atmospheric noises were 
heard by numbers in different parts of the County, at Yatesburv, Berwick, Colling- 
bourne the Pewsey Vale, on Salisbury Plain and even, (as was Wed in the public 
journals), in the neighbourhood of Reading and Wantage . . . . ' 

- Extract from ‘Wilts Archaeological Magazine,’ Vol. 6, page 387. 

Article by Rev. A. C. Smith. M.A. 



13 


Not a Cover-up But a Foul-up ? 

This is how the U.S.A.F. attitude on the question of informing the public on 
UFO sightings is described by an American scientist, Professor James McDonald, 
who has completed an investigation into ‘Project Bluebook’ files with results which 
I hope to analyse in some detail in the next issue of the ‘Journal.’ The C.I.A., 
Professor McDonald maintains, accepted the negative findings of the Robertson panel 
of 1953. Fearing that UFO reports by members of the public might block intelligence 
channels at a time of National emergency, instructions were issued that sightings 
should be debunked whenever possible in order to discourage persons from making 
reports. The Professor adds that he is unable to go along with many of the ‘Blue- 
book’ evaluations of reports. ‘Cases bearing not the slightest resemblance to feathered 
creatures were called “birds,” and some of the most improbable “balloon” phen¬ 
omena in the history of ballooning can be found in Bluebook files.’ 

Rock’d in the Cradle . . . ! 

It is to be feared that publication of Arthur Shuttlewood’s book on the War¬ 
minster phenomena, reviewed in this issue, will add to the throngs of visitors 
packing Cradle Hill on every clear evening. As a general rule, small parties of 
srvywatchers see more than crowds. Furthermore, the carnival atmosphere imparted 
to the proceedings by large gatherings of often casual watchers, cannot but detract 
from the seriousness of UFO-research in the eyes of critics. 

UFO (?) Near the Moon. 

I have received from Mr. Jun-Ichi Takanashi, Chairman of the ‘Modern Space 
Flight Association’ of Osaka, Japan, a photograph of an object alleged to be a UFO 
in the proximity of the Moon, taken on F'ebruary 13th of this year at 5.58 p.m. 
in Tokyo. If authentic, the snap is of great interest. I cannot but wonder why 
several pages of type are devoted to speculations on whether or not the mysterious 
blob of light may have been a satellite. It is, after all, not impossible to consult 
the satellite tracking experts in order to ascertain whether or not a bright satellite 
was in the vicinity of the Moon at the time and place involved. It is pointless to 
speculate when it is easy to check. 

Project Bluebook’s Vital Statistics. 

Out of 11,107 UFO reports which the U.S.A.F. UFO Project dealt with in the 
years 1947 - 1966 inclusive, 676 were written off as unexplained — 6.08%. The 
figures for given years do not check very well with those in the celebrated ‘Fact 
Sheets’ of past days. No account is taken of the proportion of UFOs probably in¬ 
cluded in the 14% or so of reports discarded as containing insufficient data for 
evaluation, or of the e\’en greater number rejected initially for the same reason. 
Contributions Please ! 

With this issue begins Volume Two of our ‘Journal.’ One of the most per¬ 
sistent criticisms I receive is that too much of the contents of the publication are 
from my pen. OF COURSE THAT IS THE CASE ! I have appealed on a 
number of occasions, in these pages and from the platform at Kensington, for out¬ 
side contributions. Few have ever been received and not all that have been proved 
suitable for publication. In the absence of other matter I am obliged to fill in the 
blank spaces myself — or else not produce a ‘Journal’ at all. It is as simple as 
that ! I would ask contributors to type on one side of the paper only and to use 
double-spacing. Articles should not normally exceed 2,000 words in length and 
should be so-worded as to be comprehensible to intelligent readers not necessarily 
in possession of specialised scientific knowledge. 

J. C-B. 




14 


U.F.O, ACTIVITY IN BRAZIL DURLNG 1965 

(continued from Spring Issue, 1967) 

September 8th Alto Purus (Amazonas) After work, some latex 

gatherers see an object like an enormous wheel, shining dazzlingly, with “two eyes” 
on the front emitting lights and fire, seemingly desirous of landing and moving 
round above the witnesses, who hide themselves. Five minutes later the object 
descended, at a distance of 10 kms. (NOTICIAS POPULARES, Sao Paulo, 
14th September.) 

September 11th at 08.00. Sao Joao, (Pernambuco) 300kms. from 

Recife, Antonio Pau Ferro sees two FS and two of their occupants, 70 cms in heio-ht 
(JORNAL DO COMERCIO, Recife. 14th Sep. ; TRIBUNA, Santos, 12th S?p.) 

September 14th 17.25 to 17.28. Caxias, (R. G. Sul) A large crowd 

see a cylindrical object at a height of 1000 metres. (DIARIO DE NOTICIAS. 
Rio. 15th September.) 

September 14th. at night Sao Joao de Maritti (State of Rio) Luminous 
object observed and photographed. (DIARIO DE NOTICIAS, Rio, 15th Sept.) 

September ? Bairro Ferraz de Vasconcelos (Sao Paulo) Luiz Camella, 

1351, ave. Brasil, sees a reddish object, with a bluish light above it. The object 
stops in the air, lighting up the “Eliza” farm, between Ferraz and Itaim. Goes off 
in a straight line. (NOTICIAS POPULARES, Sao Paulo, 28th September.) 

October ? Conceicao Macabu (Est. Rio) Darvin Ribeiro de Lima and 

Jorge Armando pick up an object fallen from the sky. (DIARIO DE NOTICIAS, 
Rio, 5th October,) 

October 18th at 18.00. Maceio (Alagoas) Very luminous FS seen at 

great height in the N. - S. direction. (O JORNAL, 19th October.) 

October 18th Ponte Praia nr. Santos & Giiaranja (Est. S. P.) Thousands 
of people see a round object which performs evolutions and flies in circles over the 
beach. Two witnesses later see it descend in a vaguely defined spot, between the 
Santos Air Base and Guaranja. (NOTICIAS POPULARES, Sao Paulo, 19th Oct.) 

October Ubatuba (S.P.) The soldier Remulfo Mendes de Almeida 

and Antonio Manini see an orange FS, fairly luminous, carrying out, very noisily, 
evolutions at a low altitude. (FOLFIA OF SAO PAULO, evening edition. 20th Oct.) 

October 21st at 19.00. Bairro Sao Cristorao (Gb) Fall of luminous 

fragments, red in colour (? balloon). (O JORNAL, 22nd October.) 

October ? Canhotinho (Alto Cruzeiro) Jose Camilo Jr. sees two beincrs 
by the side of a grounded FS. (JORNAL DO COMERCIO, Recife, 23rd Oct.f 

October 26th Mogi-Ciaca (SP) Dr Osvaldo Rangel Cardoso and the 

chafleur Xavier de Campos see their car accompanied by a FS flying above the 
vehicle. The object had descended from the sky with a strong light, then suddenly 
it turned aside towards the left In the morning Aparecida Correa da Silva 

(aged 22) had seen a round FS, changing colour every moment, descend near the 
Sugar Refinery. At 20.30 Maurice Azevedo Gomes photographed the FS near 

the Champion cellulose factory. (ESTADO DE Sao PAULO, 14th November, 
A GACETA, Sao Paulo. 6th November.) p several observations. 

October 29th Orinhos (Sao Paulo) Councillor Mucio Correa de Silva 

sees a luminous object remaining in the air for some minutes, then making off in 
a W.-E. direction. (A TRIBUNA, Santos, 30th October.) 



15 


October ? Curitiba Hundreds of people see a FS which causes the 

traffic at the Alfonso Pena Airport (State of Curitiba) to stop when it passes in a 
N.-S. direction. (O DIARIO, Belo Horizonte, 31st October.) First noticed 

at Londrona by a “Caravelle” plane which was bound for Porto Alegre. At Curitibi 
it leaves a luminous trail of bluish-white light. Altitude 20 kms. 

December 16th Santos Dumont Airport (Ril, Gb) Luminous point 

seen by the Control Tower over Penha. A request for information was sent out by 
radio to the plane of the Satia Line, which was coming in from Sao Paulo, piloted 
Inacio Pilvestra dos Santos (left Sao Paulo at 20.30.) The object was only noticed 
when the plane had turned, for it was “in the tail of the machine”. It accompanied 
the plane for a minute. Observed by the crew and by the governor of Bahia 
Lomanto, who was on board and who drew the attention of other passengers to it. 
The FS was spherical and emitted a clear light. (O GLOBO, 18th December ; 
O JORNAL, 17th December.) 

Trans, by Eric Biddle. 

ASSOCIATION JOTTINGS 

In a recent lecture delivered to the Scottish UFO Research Society by Mr. Alan 
Mayne, M.A., entitled, ‘The New Science of Holonomics and its Relationship with 
UFO Phenomena,’ it was suggested that a new and impartial study of the funda¬ 
mental laws and patterns of the Universe as a whole should be undertaken. Another 
BUFORA member, Mr. Gordon Lindsay, explained and demonstrated a new 
electronic UFO detector, which he has been developing at Glasgow University. 

Three new Member-Societies have joined the Association. They are : The 
Imperial College UFO Research Society, the Leeds University UFO Study Group 
and the North London UFO Investigation Bureau. UFO study groups in Guildford 
and South Lincolnshire have applied for Member-Society status and a new Group 
is forming at Reading. 

Mr. T. Thompson has formed a new Branch of BUFORA in Northern Ireland. 
The Cheltenham Flying Saucer Group has changed its name to the Cheltenham 
Group and has applied for Branch status. 

The Merseyside UFO Research Group is host to the Northern Regional Confer¬ 
ence in Liverpool, to be held on 4th November, 1967 at the Central Hall, Renshaw 
St., Liverpool, 1. The corresponding event in 1966, organised by the Halifax 
Branch of BUFORA, was most successful. 

Some UFO enthusiasts in Galashiels, Selkirkshire, Scotland, have recently 
formed themselves into a society and have been receiving a great deal of publicity 
on T.V. and in the local Press. Member-Societies may ponder the value of such 
methods of arousing interest in their particular areas. 

It is with regret that I am obliged to record the dissolution of the Oxford 
University UFO Study Group. This Group was formed about four years ago and 
was host to a BUFORA Regional Conference on May 8th 1965, at which a number 
of interesting ideas were advanced, including that of an International Federation of 
UFO societies. 

All Member-Societies and Branches are encouraged to write to me, at ‘Bramhall,’ 
Claremont Rd., Claygate, Esher, Surrey. 

Mike Holt, B.A. (Hon. Sec. BUFORA). 





16 


UFO MISCELLANY 

Observation : Peru, Arequipa. 

About 8 June 1966. 

“Diario de Barcelona”, 10/6/66. 

(notified by A. Ribera to jean V^uillequez) 

LIMA, 9. — (Efe). 

Two unidentified flying objects have been seen during the past 24 hours in the 
Peruvian sky. 

Xhe FIRST was observed from the town of AREQUIPA, behind the volcano 
MIATI near there ; it soon disappeared towards the west at high speed. 

^^5 ^ntable thing about this object, according to the various people who saw 
It, was its great luminosity, in addition to red, violet and green lights, and its 
ovoid shape. 


Diario de las Palmas, 31/10/66. 
FOUR UNIDENTIFIED OBJECTS are FREQUENTLY OBSERVED in MALTA. 

At first they were taken for Russian satellites but their characteristics have made 

this hypothesis untenable. 

Vaietta (Malta), 31st. (Cronica de Europa Press, exclusive to ‘‘Diario de las Palmas”) 

— Four unidentified objects frequently appear on the radar screens of the 
Detector Station installed at Xlendi, on the Isle of Como, which forms part of the 
independent Maltese state. As is the case with the rest of its territory, the station 
is managed by British troops. For this reason it is not surprising that the information 
relating to these objects is at present being carefully examined in London, in the 
hope of finding an explanation of the apparently inexplicable. 

The objects were seen for the first time some weeks ago. In this Space Age 
t ere are so many and so varied strange bodies in orbit round the earth that they 
did not attract much attention. The first explanation given of the phenomena was 
as might have been expected, that they were Soviet satellites. Everyone knows that 
the USSR does not publicise ail its space launchings and that when it does announce 
thern, it is not always that it reveals the scientific data of the experiment. There 
would, then, be nothing remarkable about the appearance of unknown objects of 
Soviet origin. ^ 

What began to shake this theory was that the objects discovered by the Xlendi 
radar did not appear to have a fixed orbital inclination as is the case with all the 
satellites of human origin which are, or have been, found to be circling round our 
planet. The objects in question move at a height of some 180 kilometres in a west 
to east direction, travelling at a speed of about 7,500 kms/hour. What began to 
arouse suspicions in the British technicians was that on the occasion of their first 
appearance the objects were coming from the south. So far there has been no 
explanation of this apparent anomaly. 

By Itself, this would not suffice to attract the attention of scientists. It was 
known later that the objects crossing space over Malta had not been observed by any 
of the other satellite-tracking stations over the world. This detail has served only 
to deepen the mystery of these strange objects. 

One of the technicians working in the radar station said to me : “They appear 
early in the morning, between 3.30 and 5.30 G.M.T.” (There is somet^hine 
missing at this point, probably because too much was cut off the sheet ; it most 
likely dealt with the apparent speed of the objects). 

It was decided to send a plane up to investigate the nature of the strange 
phenomenon or the object if there turned out to be one. But, as the R.A.F. pilot 



17 


entrusted with the mission said later, “When I closed in on the object, it accelerated 
and made off at high speed.” This manoevre began as soon as the plane in 
question reached the height at which the object was. 

The R.A.F. has declined to comment on the incident. A spokesman with 
whom I talked said to me : “We can say absolutely nothing at all”. Neither 
have any details of the observations made by the radar station been revealed. 

But if the authorities are showing themselves “cagey”, the same cannot be said 
of the population of Malta. For the vast majority the opinion that the objects 
observed are in reality “flying saucers” has been converted into a dogma of faith. 

Where there is not unanimity is in the origin which must be attributed to 
these mysterious space vehicles. To some, they are Russian, in spite of everything. 
But the majority are convinced that they come from some planet more or less remote 
from earth. In this also there are discrepancies. 

For the moment it is uncertain whether an official announcement will follow 
the investigations taking place in London. If so, however, it will most likely be 
worded in the vague and discreet tone which is normally adopted by authorities in 
such cases as the present one. 


TRIBUNA ILLUSTRATA 12/3/67. (ITALIAN) 
TFIE POLICE SAW A DISC IN TUSCANY. HERE IS THE TESTIMONY 

OF THE FACT. 

On the night of 13 July 1966 — 

a dark, moonless and stuffy night — the levehcrossing keeper, Camillo Faieta, 
who looks after the crossing at the 65 km point on the Pisa-Florence railway, had 
gone outside to await the passing through of the 804, a passenger train coming 
from Pontedera. 

All at once the crossing-keeper saw a red bolide rushing from the black sky, 
leaving behind it a luminous trail. Faieta at first thought of a wrecked aircraft in 
flames. Then he saw that the object, having reached a point some 10 metres from 
the ground, over the Bientina embankment, was gaining height again and was going 
to pause, suspended in the air, above a small tree, after which it moved to over the 
islet. 

Having found the right position, the strange object descended until it rested 
upon the high grass between the two currents of the river. 

Faieta ran into the crossing cabin and telephoned to the stationmaster of 
Pontedera, Barani, so that he could notify the police. “There is a thing on the 
Bientina that I don’t know how to describe”. “I am sending at once”, Barani 
assured him. Meanwhile, in the street, a lorry had stopped, which belonged to a 
certain Camellini, who carries the fish from Livorno to Viareggio. It must have 
been 3 o’clock in the morning. Camillini said he had seen the trail come down¬ 
wards. And he had heard like a chiming of little bells. 

The first lorry was joined by another three. Then a husband and wife 
belonging to Parma arrived on board a “Giulia”. They told the others that they 
had seen the globe of fire rush to the height of Altopascio. Meanwhile, that object, 
which had a diameter of perhaps 15 metres, was giving off an intense light. Faieta 



18 


took a signalling lantern and tried to get closer. He reached a spot three metres 

away. But when he was about to stretch out his hand, he saw under the disc two 

circular tubes about 50 centimetres in height, which disappeared from sight behind 
the disc. 

Getting scared, he went back to the cabin. The headlights of the lorry were 
directed at the object but they went out. Then, the telephone also went dead. At 
a quarter to four the object unexpectedly disappeared completely. It had remained 
on the ground for exactly an hour and 25 minutes, from 2.30 until 3.45. 

A policeman and the carabinieri also arrived. The policeman saw the luminous 
object suspended on the grass on the islet but before returning to his station to 

report, he is said to have remarked to Faieta : “Yes, I saw it ; but remember, I 

must not have seen.” 

— Renato Albanese. 


The legend under the picture reads : 

The Eye Witness of Pontedera. Camillo Faieta points out the tiny islet on which 
he saw the luminous flying disc land on 13 July 1966. 


BUFORA (LATE) NEWS 

by The Publicity Officer 

Dr. Edward Condon of the California University team investigating UFOs on 
behalf of the United States Air Force has applied for BUFORA membership. 

The National Sky-Watch Day had already been mentioned in several local 
papers by June 16th. At least four national newspapers had also included brief 
details and the London EVENING STANDARD gave a particularly good write-up. 

In connection with the Sky-watch day, Lionel Beer recorded a few minutes for 
the B.B.C. world service on June 10th. The following Monday, June 19th, Edgar 
Hatvany, BUFORA s chief Sky-Watch Day organiser, was scheduled to record 
material at the Granada television studios in Manchester. 

Mike Holt, BUFORA’s Hon. Secretary, said he had also been asked to record 
a few minutes for the B.B.C. programme “TODAY”. 

Lawrence Moore, BUFORA s Photographic Consultant, had arranged to film 
sky-watch day activities in the neighbourhood of Guilford, exclusively for B.B.C’s. 
“PANORAMA”. It was arranged that special equipment and the Mobile Unit 
would be located there. 


We had also heard with gratification that other members of BUFORA had or 
were taking part in radio or television programmes in different parts of the country. 

Lastly, following a meeting with a representative of the DAILY MAIL’s 
exhibition department, it is hoped that BUFORA will be co-operating with the 
organisers in providing a striking flying saucer theme for the DAILY MAIL 
sponsored SCHOOLBOYS AND GIRLS EXHIBITION at Olympia on December 
27th to January 6th. 




19 


“Paris'Normandie” \312167. 

IN MEXICO. 

COLLISION between a Flying Saucer and a Plane avoided by a hairsbreadth. 

Shortly before landing at Mexico, an air liner narrowly missed striking in full 
flight what was believed to be a Flying Saucer, the evening paper “Ultimas Noticias” 
announced on Saturday. 

The plane, belonging to the Guatemala Aviation Company, was flying over the 
state of Oaxaca, 400 km to the south-east of the capital, when the crew and some 
of the passengers saw a round object which was travelling at high speed in the 
opposite direction pass quite close to the plane. The pilot. Colonel Alfredo Castaneda, 
and the co-pilot, Capt. Carlos Samayos, stated that the object resembled a silvery 
spinning top and was crowned with a kind of red ball. Its diameter was about 
10 metres. “We observed it for ten seconds” added Col. Castaneda, who has been 
flying for twenty years, “I had never seen anything like it and the affair has made 
a vivid impression upon me”. The stewardess declared that the object passed at 
less than 20 metres from the carlingue. 

The crew reported the incident to the Airport at Mexico City. They said there 
could be no question of the object being a sounding balloon, considering the position 
and altitude of the plane at the time of the “meeting”. 



THIS DOES NOT MEAN METEORS, LIGHT YEARS OR GAS. 

IN FACT IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE UNIVERSE AT ALL. 

BUT 

We do sell universally used products such as Plywoods, 
Blockboards, Chipboards and Plastics. 

Be you a humble “Do-it-yourself” man, or in business 
in a small way, or a dirty big contractor, we would like 
to do business with you. 

If you ask us nicely, we will be delighted to tell you 
about our stock and send you a price list. 

The name is : Peter Wain, M.L.G. TRADING LTD. 

51 High Street Croydon, Surrey 
Tel: 01 - 688 5012 or 01 MUN 1168 

V.I.P. treatment if you mention this Journal ! 


REGIONAL INFORMATION OFFICERS 

All details of recent UFO sightings from whatsoever source they may arise 
should be sent immediately to the Area Information Officers listed here. Local 
investigations may then be possible while the incidents are fresh in the minds of 
witnesses. An immediate telephone call to Information Officer concerned or to 
Central Information Office, London, (cost refunded) is recommended. 






20 


Cumberland, Durham, Northumberland, North Riding of Yorkshire : Tyneside 
UFO Society : W. D. Muir, 72 Greystoke Avenue, Jesmond, Newcastle-upon-Tyne 2. 
Tel : Day : Gosforth 5-7111 Ext. 679. Evening & night : J.L. Otley : Newcastle 3-8025 

Lancashire, Wirral Peninsula (Cheshire), Isle of Man, Anglesey, North Wales: 
Merseyside UFO Research Group : R. Donnelly, 2 Buckfast Close, Liverpool 10. 
Tel : John Harney, Eastham 2146. * 

Cheshire, Derbyshire, Staffordshire, Leicestershire : Direct Investigation Group 
on Aerial Phenomena : A. Tomlinson, 24 Bent Fold Drive, Unsworth, Bury. 
Tel : Whitefield 4560 ; (or Tel : Mrs. J. Nelstrop : Bramhall 4802.) 

Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire, East <Sc West Ridings of Yorkshire : Halifax Branch : 
J. M. Stear, 2 High Park Crescent, Heaton, Bradford 9. Tel : Bradford 41842. 

North-east half of Gloucestershire, Herefordshire, Shropshire, Worcestershire, 
Wales south of and including Cardiganshire & Montgomeryshire : Cheltenham Flying 
Saucer Group : A. R. Cole, Ellesmere, 7 Okua Rd., Charlton Kings, Glos. 

Tel : J. Whitaker : Cheltenham 53864. 

Warwickshire: Stratford-on Avon UFO Group : J. D. Llewellyn, 63 Masons Rd., 
Stratford-on-Avon, Warwickshire. 

Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Huntingdonshire, Norfolk, Northamptonshire, 
Rutland, Suffolk : Cambridge University Group for the Investigation of UFOs : 

Easter term : 20th April to 10th June : A. C. H. Durham, Clare College, Cambridge. 
Vacations : J. A. Popple, 10 Kingsmead Road, Waterbeach, Cambs. Tel : (all year 
round) Waterbeach 660 or (day) : Cambridge 55691. 

Cornwall, Devon, Dorset, South-western half of Gloucestershire, Somerset, 
Wiltshire : British Flying Saucer Bureau : G.F.N. Knewstub, A.M.Brit.LR.E., A.Inst.E., 
27 Station Road, Shirehampton, Bristol. Tel : Avonmouth 2288. 

Hampshire, Isle of Wight : Isle of Wight UFO Investigation Society : 
Mrs. K. Smith, ‘Ringlemere’, Colwell Rd., Colwell Bay, I.O.W. Tel : Freshwater 2435 

Surrey : Croydon UFO Research & Investigation Society : H. Roberts, 47 Brigstock Rd., 
Thornton Heath, Surrey. Tel : THOrnton Heath 8480. 

Scotland : Scottish UFO Research Society : Glen Chandler, 11 Lismorc Crescent, 
Edinburgh 8. Tel : Abbeyhill 3025. 

Northern Ireland : T. Thompson, 23 Mountainvale Rd., Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim. 

London, Essex, Hertfordshire, Kent, Middlesex, Sussex, Berkshire, 
Buckinghamshire : Central Information Office : Ken Rogers, 1 Vicar’s Moor Lane, 
Winchmore Hill, London, N.2L Tel : LABurnum 2482 ; Personal enquiries 
answered 8.30 - 10.30 a.m. & 8.00 - 10.30 p.m. weekdays ; reports taken at all 
times, (alternative : Tel : E. Hatvany, Feltham 7405.) 



Antiques in the Traditional Style 


FINE 17/18 CENTURY COUNTRY and COTTAGE 
FURNITURE in OAK, ELM, PINE, FRUITWOOD, etc. 

EUROPEAN, EASTERN and SOUTH AMERICAN 
WORKS of ART for the COLLECTOR 

IVAR MaCKAY 

(Exhibitor at Chelsea Spring and Autumn Antique Fairs) 


4 KENSINGTON CHURCH WALK, 
LONDON, W.8. 

— Tel : WEStern 0983 (Evenings : WES 3323 — 


FLYING SAUCER 
MAGAZINES 

from the U.K., U.S.A., and 
Australia, including “Flying 
Saucer Review” 

(Singly : 5, 6d. each inc. postage) 

UFO BOOKS 

By Scientists 
General Information 
Contact Stories 
(15 Titles) 

Free List ; L. Beer SB5, 

Flat 15 Freshwater Court, 

Crawford Street, London, W.l. 


UFO HANDBOOK No.2 

by F. Malcolm Bull 

A useful means of identifying 
aerial phenomena. 30 half¬ 
foolscap duplicated pages, 
plus a free printed star map. 

Proceeds from the sale of 
this Handbook will go into 
the BUFORA Research 
Fund. 

Send 7/6d. to : 

L. Beer SB5, 

Flat 15 Freshwater Court, 
Crawford St., London, W.l 


Bobbies (Primers), 47 Chase Side, Enfield 











r