Craig Winn is just another writer in a long line of hateful, ignorant, self-righteous writers over the past 1,500 years, not unlike Isodore, Bede, etc., who only manage to portray their utter narcissistic hateful ignorance by attacking "the messenger" because they cannot morally or academically debate "the message." Islam and the Prophet Muhammed are too sublime for any ignorant person, writer or reader, to negate this divine message to humanity, no matter what their hate, warmongering, racist, violent attitude may be...whether in the past, the present, or in the future.

I am glad to see that Craig Winn did place these audio files in the archives. As a jew who attends 'observant' jewish religious services, I have of course some issues with his interpretations of Talmud, and Torah, but that does not detract from his observations about Islam, nor the meanings of the Judeo Christian religions compared to the utterly supremicist political religion of Mohammed. And his audio files remains an important exposition of what the Qu'ran actually says, means, and it's utterly
hateful, goals, verified in it's actual history.
As for the reviewer who commented that the author should look into the Bible's murderous wording, as 'worse' than Islam, this is utterly without foundation. The physicist, Bill Warner, for one, complled an accurate listing of the warlike, political violence and the Hebrew Bible has some 34,000 words in this regard, and the Quran, hadiths, and Sira have some 328,000!! words. And the study of the history of each religion clearly evidences the reality and nature of each. Those who try to compare like this are utterly without foundation.

I have no bias on any people. Only, the religion. I have friends that are muslims, many other religions & races. We are all human & should be treated the same no matter who you are. My comment is out of love & Not hate.

Those who comment that the bible is bloodthirsty are people who probably haven't read the context surrounding certain scriptures or blindly defending their beliefs without checking alll the facts. In all things, study both sides of the argument before deciding what's right or wrong. I have researched both sides extensively for decades as a part of my work in the secular world.

If you look deeper into the context of those verses. You will realize that the people God had destroyed were those that were living very unnatural lives. Sacrificing their children to strange gods, people saying they were god, cannibalism, complete societal breakdown of the family, unnatural & perverted sex acts, etc. These actions had become the norm & not isolated incidents. There was also the “Nephilm” that played a big part of this corruption. It was a nations spiritual & secular anarchy at its finest (WORST). Other incidents, relating to individuals & not nations, have to be put into context of the times they were living in. If they had not been destroyed we would not be here today as they would have eventually destroyed the world.

Jesus Christ's offering on the cross was the sacrifice that paid for the sins of mankind for all those that would truthfully confess & be sorrowful that they were sinners and ask Him into their heart as their personal savior. This changes all methods by which mankind was judged by God previously in the Old Testament. A pure and perfect sacrifice had to be provided and it was.

So, yes, we have a loving God who gave His own Son to save humanity from eternal destruction in the afterlife. And, not the brutal God, the foolish people claim that He is. This is the path to eternal destruction in this life and the afterlife.

Islam, on the other hand, demands the sacrifice of believers sons to guarantee an eternal life in heaven with 72 virgins for the martyr. As well, the successful dead jihadist will have favored with god the granting of a number of his relatives into heaven when they die.

ISLAM vs CHRISTIANITY, You choose?
- Islam: Eternal sex with 72 virgins that regain their virginity after sex. And, a never ending supply of grapes, wine, relatives in heaven who the martyr died for, etc. for MURDERING innocent women, children & also some combatants.
- Christianity: Eternal life in heaven where Jesus has prepared a mansion for us already. No evil, no death, no disease, no old bodies, no lies only truth, no aches or pains, just eternal life with a depth of love unimaginable by our present standards and a true face-to-face relationship with God who is always accessable. Murder, has always been forbidden in Christianity.

The God of the bible has given us free choice of the path we want to follow. Islam doesn’t!

Your Choice!

There is no better and more concise review of the inner workings of Islam than this one! Nobody really has any business making public policy statements about the Muslim Politico-Religious establishment before hearing it. It is a required study, and you will not find any better and more scholarly work than this one out there - at least, one which is accessible to the lay person. Hats off and my profound thanks to Craig Will for his tireless work in putting it together!

The Quran pales in comparison to the Bible in terms of violent and lurid content. I suggest you do a survey of that absurd tome--the incidences of carnage, incest, vengeance, ridiculous tenets etc., in the Bible far outnumber those in the Quran.

Since your aim is merely to demonize Islam you may as well look at the phantasmagoric bloodlust that is your own tradition.

Radical Islam is a real threat to every living being on this earth. It takes only one hateful person to bring down a mountain, killing hundreds of innocent lives. And for what? Ancient ideals of revenge, hate and intolerance to others who want to live differently from yourself?
I fully understand there are facets to every religion. Even though somewhat splintered, for most all other religions the fundamental ideals generally remain in agreement. But to ask everyone to simply avoid the passages of hate and justified murder in your Quran does not a peaceful religion make!
Religion is what allows mankind to live TOGETHER; in relative peace and harmony.
Any, and I repeat ANY deviance from this understanding cannot be called "religion"
This, is the fundamental flaw in Islam.

In the introductory passage, the author asks the listener to be an "informed skeptic", contrasting Muhammed as individual with the set of "40 authors... over the course of 15 centuries" of the Bible. The author scorns that Mohammed produced "no miracles... no healings, no walking on water, parting seas, raising folks from the dead, or feeding multitudes." Patrons who bring a more fundamental skepticism to bear may wish to avoid this listening exercise.

Don't insult a religion. Instead, Why don't you try to learn about Islam from another point of view. Often a lot of people are misguided by what they read on sites such as these. And even more often is someone mislead by what is seen in media and this compels a great many people to search on the wrong side of things. And another thing, most of your sorces of (peices) of information have been taken out of context by people with the same intention of yourself, to make others hate Islam with the same "Islam is terror" attitude. So, maybe take the time to visit a local mosque amd speak to the Imaam and ask him for some information and some of his views. Please do not take this as destructive critisism but Constructive Critisism. The last thing I would want is to make your look towards Islam worse. Rasheed